Muscatine

A.  He claims he had nothing to do with Bain Capital after February 1999.

B.   He's listed as chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President,  and sole stockholder as late as 2002.

C.   He's paid over $100,000 in annual salary for the years he "had nothing to do with Bain Capital".

A.  He claims he had nothing to do with Bain Capital after February 1999.

So what, it doesn't matter now either way

B.   He's listed as chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President,  and sole stockholder as late as 2002.That cannot be refuted and still seems trivial, all the jobs they sent down the drain are still affective to his bid.

C.   He's paid over $100,000 in annual salary for the years he "had nothing to do with Bain Capital".

Proved or not, his wealth and tiny tax bill stands alone as his greatest bane-oops I said Bane-

None of this makes much if any difference anyway.

I decided the man only gives a swines butt about those WAY up there with him at the top cash-out levels months ago. When he quite sarcastically declared that "coprs are people too my friend" It doesn't matter either that he thinks we should think he meant that those WAY up there are the good ole boys giving great paying jobs to all us lowly greedy, payday wanting,  food and shelter seeking Americans all the way down here at the bottom 90% with 10% of the wealth and getting smaller. Can we say PIPE DREAM -----Job creators my wrinkled old butt!---Tax the rich more? No ma am, I say just make em pay what they were supposed to in the first place. Go ahead and cut the rate to whatever the rest of us average, but also take away the entitlements they enjoy too. If Ronmey wants to show he really cares about America and ALL it's people then fine do it right, announce the flat tax rate plan and that he thinks all Americans should pay where they were taxed.. I don't care what he has in his bank accounts on or off shore, but I do care that he gained those accounts by helping send jobs out of this country, while looking for EVERY stinking tax shelter and loophole in the 14-hundred plus pages he and all thoise other super ruch enjoy. It's so fricken funny that when he talks about the health-care replacement he describes what the law already does outside the mandate. I actually think we need the healthcare law, but I hate the madate. I don't want to repeal the law just the mandate. Besides it was good enough for Romney and his state, then it's good enough for anything he oversees as long as he lives. He can't take it back now. Why in the name of common sense would he even start with hating the poster child of a law he was perfectly fine with before running for the white house, is just out there---------------- like the golden tablets. Mr. Mobaydave is right. Libertarians are okay. Oh yes, uhuh oh yes--- a return to the Republic and all it once stood for. Out of many-ONE.- E pluribus unum. The candidates and representatives that actually understand, that this is one nation with 370 million people not a tenth of that, are worth voting for. If obama wins again, it's because the greater number trust that he understands this well above Romney. Also that there are no golden tablets. Just more gold at the top. Sickness it is, greed is a sickness and it's infected our world. Did you knmow that every time a horse, hog, cow or dog poops or toots the methane rate goes up and heats up the planet? Likewise every time a politician speaks the same damn thing happens. I have a new term for this new breed of republican. They are Greepublicans. It is said, that the measure of a man is that his life means so much more that isn't sel;fish and stands for Honesty, truth, and integrity. Not since Hoover have we seen this in the white house. Perhaps Carter to a degree. But I did enjoy Reagan a whole lot. Who could EVER forget-"Mr. Gorbechev, tear down that WEALL" Of course we knew it would have happened  anyway, with or without Reagan. But what a story to tell the kids one day. When a true Republiocan stood for the nation and not the greedy few. Trickle down Romney isn't anything but a Greepublican and neither were any of his opponents. It's funny that the reason he's even the nominee isn't that the greepublican establishment wanted him, but that he seemed the best of the worst to the electorate. I will always remember what Newt said about Romney and by God ---------he meant it and wasn't wrong. Neither was Hillary but that's another story.