|
It's not that tough to see both sides when you're too gutless to choose a side. That's a tortured bit of logic. What was it intended to mean?
When you constantly see both sides of an issue, you are called a "fence straddler". You don't have the guts to set down on either side. Easy to see both sides with that fence shoved up your arse, isn't it Mal? Your soulmate BDI lives her life on top of that fence.
Now, go think for yourself for once. |
|
|
|
||
|
SL....an excellent, simple and accurate assessment.
But she'll never get it. |
|
|
60 feet? Not a problem.
Now, go take a gun owners class. Find out for yourself. I would assume all or at least most of those police had gun training yet they couldn't accomplish what your claim. Explain. |
|
|
Malodery is showing her/his/its ignorance.
One does not have to penetrate body armour in order to stop a confrontation.
An unexpected center of mass hit on a "bullet proof" vest will often convince an amateur that continuing their behavior is not in their best interest.
A law abiding, trained citizen with a legal weapon firing back at someone is enough to change the situation for the better in many cases. I would want that option if I was in a situation such as occurred in Aurora.
If you dont' believe this, I challenge you to meet me out at Weise's Slough wearing your body armour.
There is no body armour involved, but here is an example of what happens to perps when they get unexpected armed resistance. Note how the "situation" changes instantly. The old geezer that stood up for all those in the cafe was using a .380 handgun which is a rather mild caliber and not normally fatal unless one is lucky enough to get a head shot. I submit that even if the two perps were wearing body armor, they still would have skeedadled. |
Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo
For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!
