"That's a lot of information but I just wondered which you thought was the better outcome. Armed population or unarmed population?"
OK,...I'll ask....."better outcome" for whom?
|
"That's a lot of information but I just wondered which you thought was the better outcome. Armed population or unarmed population?"
OK,...I'll ask....."better outcome" for whom?
|
|
|
||
|
"That's a lot of information but I just wondered which you thought was the better outcome. Armed population or unarmed population?"
OK,...I'll ask....."better outcome" for whom?
|
|
|
Armed of course. An armed population is always needed to defeat a tyrannical government. |
|
|
As long as we have a federal government that wishes to tightly and tyrannically control all law abiding citizens, there cannot be a better outcome for "all". As our founding fathers taught us, an armed law abiding and moral citizenry is better for the citizens. A disarmed law abiding and moral citizenry is better for the tyrants. |