I'm guessing you're one of the Perky owners, otherwise why are you so interested in this?
So anyway, about that "you should have thought of that before you moved next to the bar" argument:
1. Not everyone has the economic privilege to live in the place of their choice, and just because some people don't have as much money as other people should not mean they have fewer property rights.
2. Even if someone chose to live there, the Perky was violating noise ordinances and nuisance bar ordinances. This was decided by the Liquor Control Board. Why should they be exempt from complying to the laws?
3. The household in question had lived in Oaks since 1977, back when the Perky was a quiet bar where factory workers would go after work and late night disturbances were rare. The Perky also switched owners several times since then. Only in 2009 did they start playing live music, and talking to bar owners, local township officers, etc about the noise issues did nothing. I understand that some neighbors complain about petty things (grass too tall, clothesline outside, etc) but these are not trivial complaints. On weekends, sleep was not an option until after 3am and sleep disturbances also frequently happened on weeknights, as well as trespassing, littering, and other violations. If anything, the people who wanted to sleep at night (which most people take for granted!) and basically uphold their property rights and local laws are the ones who have been demonized.
4. The Perky can find a way to run their business that complies with laws and doesn't cause conflicts with nearby residents, and I hope that they do.



