It has always been my teaching that people elected to serve in public office are representatives of the people. They are the people?’s voice in matters of government. Why then is no one asking us anything about this agreement between the city and township? I am starting to see somewhat a matter of taxation without representation. The recent unscientific poll taken by the SE Messenger shows that 89% of the respondents were against this agreement. Certainly our representatives have to take stock of this number. Unscientific as it may be, if the numbers were much closer to 50% on each side then maybe proceeding forward would have some merit. However, when nearly 9 out of 10 respondents are against something it is time to think before acting.
It has been reported that there has been no cost benefit analysis done to defend the agreement. Then on what basis is it prudent to proceed forward? I agree with other posters that trust has to begin somewhere, but an agreement of this magnitude is not the place to start. Why are the city residents not being given the opportunity to look at numbers that will convince us that this particular agreement is beneficial. All we read are words and threats. Words that we need to get to 33 and threats that if we don?’t hurry and sign, other agencies will enter into agreements with the township. Please stop threatening us. The school board has threatened us for years with split sessions, an end to extracurriculars and so much more. We have, time and time again, called their bluff. Why should the threat of other agencies entering onto agreements with the township be any different?
I want to name the 5 people supporting this agreement and make my please to you directly as all of you read this forum and sometimes post.
?• Mayor David Shaver
?• Councilwoman Heidi Riggs
?• Councilwoman Cristie Hammond
?• Councilman Keith Smith
?• Councilman Jeff Fix
In your own words, the votes has already been taken and tallied. You seek to move this issue from committee to committee to expedite the matter. Please be more thoughtful an prudent before you rush. The five of you have apparently seen information and data to support your commitment to Mr. Fix with promising your votes. Please share this data with us so we can understand and not have to face the mudslinging that would result with a referendum.
Mrs. Riggs, I appeal to you as you are beginning to finally recall your campaign promises. You promised so much more than you state in the papers relating to working with the township. You promised to listen and respond to the citizens. Why have you now closed your ears? You are a smart woman and you hold a position in the state of high regard and responsibility. Do you base the complicated decisions you have to make daily on the advice of just one person or do you demand research and statistics and piles of data? I am sure it is the latter. It has to be or a responsible man such as Mr. Blackwell would have corrected the situation years ago.
Mayor Shaver, you are a practicing attorney who planned to run for the bench. Are the decisions you make in your legal practice and your personal life based on words solely? At some point in time when you are seeking judgment, there are dollar figures involved. I can?’t imagine you simply pluck numbers out of thin air in seeking restitutions and it is safe to assume that no judge would permit you to without data to back up your claims. The same applies here. You need to take the time to analyze the analysis that proves this will be a boon for the community you swore to serve. You need to treat us as if we were the judge in your case and present us with data before moving forward with your case.
continued
By KT Smith
It has been reported that there has been no cost benefit analysis done to defend the agreement. Then on what basis is it prudent to proceed forward? I agree with other posters that trust has to begin somewhere, but an agreement of this magnitude is not the place to start. Why are the city residents not being given the opportunity to look at numbers that will convince us that this particular agreement is beneficial. All we read are words and threats. Words that we need to get to 33 and threats that if we don?’t hurry and sign, other agencies will enter into agreements with the township. Please stop threatening us. The school board has threatened us for years with split sessions, an end to extracurriculars and so much more. We have, time and time again, called their bluff. Why should the threat of other agencies entering onto agreements with the township be any different?
I want to name the 5 people supporting this agreement and make my please to you directly as all of you read this forum and sometimes post.
?• Mayor David Shaver
?• Councilwoman Heidi Riggs
?• Councilwoman Cristie Hammond
?• Councilman Keith Smith
?• Councilman Jeff Fix
In your own words, the votes has already been taken and tallied. You seek to move this issue from committee to committee to expedite the matter. Please be more thoughtful an prudent before you rush. The five of you have apparently seen information and data to support your commitment to Mr. Fix with promising your votes. Please share this data with us so we can understand and not have to face the mudslinging that would result with a referendum.
Mrs. Riggs, I appeal to you as you are beginning to finally recall your campaign promises. You promised so much more than you state in the papers relating to working with the township. You promised to listen and respond to the citizens. Why have you now closed your ears? You are a smart woman and you hold a position in the state of high regard and responsibility. Do you base the complicated decisions you have to make daily on the advice of just one person or do you demand research and statistics and piles of data? I am sure it is the latter. It has to be or a responsible man such as Mr. Blackwell would have corrected the situation years ago.
Mayor Shaver, you are a practicing attorney who planned to run for the bench. Are the decisions you make in your legal practice and your personal life based on words solely? At some point in time when you are seeking judgment, there are dollar figures involved. I can?’t imagine you simply pluck numbers out of thin air in seeking restitutions and it is safe to assume that no judge would permit you to without data to back up your claims. The same applies here. You need to take the time to analyze the analysis that proves this will be a boon for the community you swore to serve. You need to treat us as if we were the judge in your case and present us with data before moving forward with your case.
continued
By KT Smith