Congratulations to the city of Pickerington !!!!!
Pickerington anti-growth plan stalls
Councilman gets proposal to different committee, but it still doesn?’t pass
By Kirk D . Richards THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
It was Pickerington Councilman Jeff Fix?’s idea to have the city?’s service committee consider his plan for an economic agreement with Violet Township.
But last night, members of that committee expressed reservations.
The issue had been before the finance committee, but Fix asked Mayor David Shaver to switch it to the service committee, where he thought he?’d have a better chance for passage.
Fix, who is on the finance committee but not on the service committee, got his wish. But last night, Council President Brian Wisniewski led a persuasive presentation denouncing the plan.
According to Wisniewski?’s analysis of the plan, the city would be giving up the right to annex residential and agricultural land from Violet Township for 30 years, in exchange for possibly working with the township on developing 42 acres of commercial land.
When the proposal switched to the service committee, critics complained that Fix made the request because Cristie Hammond and Heidi Riggs, of that committee, favored the concept. The third member, Ted Hackworth, is against the plan, but Fix thought the other two would outvote him.
The plan must be forwarded from a committee to go to a full vote before City Council.
But Riggs declined to bring the issue to a vote last night.
''I think you?’ve done a very good job in your research,'' Riggs told Wisniewski. ''I don?’t think the agreement is in any position to move out of service.''
Hammond concurred.
''I have never been 100 percent behind this particular agreement,'' Hammond said.
Fix arrived two hours late for the meeting because he was returning from a trip to Texas.
He had little to say, but he has promoted the agreement as a way to limit residential growth and bring in more commercial development. He has said the opportunity requires some concessions to Violet Township.
Councilman Michael Sabatino commended Riggs and Hammond for holding off, but questioned why the issue was moved from finance to service in the first place.
''I don?’t think how it was done was right,'' Sabatino said. ''It seems like an exercise in futility to me.''
Wisniewski based his analysis on reports from city consultants and projections from the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission, and noted that the agreement covers only land within the Pickerington school district. The thousands of acres that Fix said would be available are either outside of the district or lack roads large enough to handle developments, Wisniewski said.
He said he is not against cooperation with the township but thinks that giving up the power to annex residential or agricultural land for 30 years would tie the hands of future councils.
Although the city could annex commercial land under the agreement, the city would have to give up 50 percent of its income tax from those businesses, Wisniewski said.
''I?’m disappointed that the mayor isn?’t here because he pulled it from finance,'' resident Doug Blake said, urging that the council not rush the proposal through. ''This is the most important piece of legislation I?’ve seen in the five years I?’ve been here.''
krichards@dispatch.com
Pickerington anti-growth plan stalls
Councilman gets proposal to different committee, but it still doesn?’t pass
By Kirk D . Richards THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
It was Pickerington Councilman Jeff Fix?’s idea to have the city?’s service committee consider his plan for an economic agreement with Violet Township.
But last night, members of that committee expressed reservations.
The issue had been before the finance committee, but Fix asked Mayor David Shaver to switch it to the service committee, where he thought he?’d have a better chance for passage.
Fix, who is on the finance committee but not on the service committee, got his wish. But last night, Council President Brian Wisniewski led a persuasive presentation denouncing the plan.
According to Wisniewski?’s analysis of the plan, the city would be giving up the right to annex residential and agricultural land from Violet Township for 30 years, in exchange for possibly working with the township on developing 42 acres of commercial land.
When the proposal switched to the service committee, critics complained that Fix made the request because Cristie Hammond and Heidi Riggs, of that committee, favored the concept. The third member, Ted Hackworth, is against the plan, but Fix thought the other two would outvote him.
The plan must be forwarded from a committee to go to a full vote before City Council.
But Riggs declined to bring the issue to a vote last night.
''I think you?’ve done a very good job in your research,'' Riggs told Wisniewski. ''I don?’t think the agreement is in any position to move out of service.''
Hammond concurred.
''I have never been 100 percent behind this particular agreement,'' Hammond said.
Fix arrived two hours late for the meeting because he was returning from a trip to Texas.
He had little to say, but he has promoted the agreement as a way to limit residential growth and bring in more commercial development. He has said the opportunity requires some concessions to Violet Township.
Councilman Michael Sabatino commended Riggs and Hammond for holding off, but questioned why the issue was moved from finance to service in the first place.
''I don?’t think how it was done was right,'' Sabatino said. ''It seems like an exercise in futility to me.''
Wisniewski based his analysis on reports from city consultants and projections from the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission, and noted that the agreement covers only land within the Pickerington school district. The thousands of acres that Fix said would be available are either outside of the district or lack roads large enough to handle developments, Wisniewski said.
He said he is not against cooperation with the township but thinks that giving up the power to annex residential or agricultural land for 30 years would tie the hands of future councils.
Although the city could annex commercial land under the agreement, the city would have to give up 50 percent of its income tax from those businesses, Wisniewski said.
''I?’m disappointed that the mayor isn?’t here because he pulled it from finance,'' resident Doug Blake said, urging that the council not rush the proposal through. ''This is the most important piece of legislation I?’ve seen in the five years I?’ve been here.''
krichards@dispatch.com