|
|
Why not Canal? Or any other city
Please explain how it keeps us out? Because we won't be invited? Why has no other municipality been even asked to do the same? This is a power play by the township. Period.
And by the way, the township doesn't have any land. The property owners do.
I'm sorry you've bought into the sound bites. ONLY Brian's done their homework.
By Inquiring minds
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who's hiding the facts?
First, I haven't seen any facts from the No side. All speculation and scare tactics. What is the potential loss from not being able to annex? Nobody has even addressed that number. Facts are available from the B.W. blog regarding land, etc. Where are you facts available from? A flyer full of half truths?
What new was going to be contained in this mailer from the Yes or No sides of the issue? Please save me the rhetoric.
By Issue 9 will let voters decide
|
|
|
Ignorance?
I'm glad I have a chance to vote on this. I was ignoring the facts until Sabatino spoke up. Thanks for the wake up call, Mike!
By Check the facts, Daddy
|
|
|
Fraud on council
The Trustees will now have to expose their political agenda if they exclude Pickerington for more talks. If they are rejected again then Pickerington will still have its rights.
Before you buy into the ''BIG REVENUES'' song please do some actual fact checking and see what it is costing Canal to generate those BIG REVENUES.
Jeff there are always TWO sides to the balances sheet. Apparently you must have missed the line item on your company budget entitled ''COST OF SALES''. Many times corporation increases the revenues and it is ate up in additional costs. As a business manager of a $75 Million company wouldn't you consider that first before jumping into a ''deal?''
I think the citizens are begining to see you for what you are?
|
