For those of you that thought the chat section of the article in the Lancaster Eagle-Gazette about Riggs for Mayor ended with the two or three snippets posted here, you're wrong.
I have pasted more of the comments here for your perusal:
Reader comments and feedback for the
Riggs to run for mayor of Pickerington
article.
Anyway, for those who still care about free speech, here is a summary of a conversation that I had with the current first lady of Pickerington shortly after her husband's election: the controlled growth plan proposed by the Shaver administration is a valid and fair program that does not seek to stop growth, it only asks those who profit from the growth to pay part of the cost of expanding city serivcies to meet the needs of the developers' customers rather than expecting the current residents, many of whom feel that their quality of living is being degraded by growth, from being forced to contribute on a par with the new residents while the only people who clearly benefit from the growth, the devleopers themselves, contribute only a token portion of the total cost of developing their new ''communities.'' If Pickerington succeeds in holding those who profit most to paying a fair share of the added expense of having their products in the community, then Lancaster, Lithopolis, Baltimore and every other community that might be set up as an easy mark for a fast buck developer will have a much easier time resisting the influence peddling that leads up to these sweetheart deals that increase builders' profits by passing a significant portion of the true total cost of buying a new home on to the existing residents of the community, many of whom don't want new neighbors in the first place.
Picktown Swami
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Pickerington
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:04 am Post subject: Riggs as Mayor or an extension of David Shaver's Policies
What does Riggs as Mayor have to offer the citizens of Pickerington?
My prognostication is 4 more years of David Shaver like Politics.
Riggs has been a blind follower of David Shaver and his policies and iniatives, and has publicly stated so in the Columbus Dispatch.
Riggs is and probably will continue to be an operative for the Fix Shaver
concerns at City Hall. What leadership qualities have been established in her time on Council? Riggs says she wants to NOW engage the public,
what a departure from her record. One of the current Mayor's shortcomings is in appearances, grand openings, etc. Now look at Rigg's council & committee attendance records. Not very impressive. Most of the grand openings, ribbon cuttings occur during the work day, how will that work with her new job?
What we need in a Mayor is someone who will present a positive image about Pickerington, be present for ALL the ribbon cuttings, grand openings etc, and be a uniter of everything dealing with the public image of Pickerington. I admit there currently is a low threshold to surpass to show improvement of the performance of David Shaver, but hopefully someone else will run that better matches the needs of Pickerington.
It is time for change in Pickerington Politics. Riggs is not a change agent but represents a continuation of the current administration.
God help us all if there is no other choice.
nobody
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 8
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: Not what's needed
Heidi preaches a good game but needs people behind the scenes telling her what to say and do. She's a good-ol buddy Republican tied to the Lancaster crew and county party but she's has a Democrat running her campaign.
We need original thoughts and someone concerned about the city of Pickerington not another clone.
Thanks but no thanks Ms. Riggs.
I have pasted more of the comments here for your perusal:
Reader comments and feedback for the
Riggs to run for mayor of Pickerington
article.
Anyway, for those who still care about free speech, here is a summary of a conversation that I had with the current first lady of Pickerington shortly after her husband's election: the controlled growth plan proposed by the Shaver administration is a valid and fair program that does not seek to stop growth, it only asks those who profit from the growth to pay part of the cost of expanding city serivcies to meet the needs of the developers' customers rather than expecting the current residents, many of whom feel that their quality of living is being degraded by growth, from being forced to contribute on a par with the new residents while the only people who clearly benefit from the growth, the devleopers themselves, contribute only a token portion of the total cost of developing their new ''communities.'' If Pickerington succeeds in holding those who profit most to paying a fair share of the added expense of having their products in the community, then Lancaster, Lithopolis, Baltimore and every other community that might be set up as an easy mark for a fast buck developer will have a much easier time resisting the influence peddling that leads up to these sweetheart deals that increase builders' profits by passing a significant portion of the true total cost of buying a new home on to the existing residents of the community, many of whom don't want new neighbors in the first place.
Picktown Swami
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Pickerington
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:04 am Post subject: Riggs as Mayor or an extension of David Shaver's Policies
What does Riggs as Mayor have to offer the citizens of Pickerington?
My prognostication is 4 more years of David Shaver like Politics.
Riggs has been a blind follower of David Shaver and his policies and iniatives, and has publicly stated so in the Columbus Dispatch.
Riggs is and probably will continue to be an operative for the Fix Shaver
concerns at City Hall. What leadership qualities have been established in her time on Council? Riggs says she wants to NOW engage the public,
what a departure from her record. One of the current Mayor's shortcomings is in appearances, grand openings, etc. Now look at Rigg's council & committee attendance records. Not very impressive. Most of the grand openings, ribbon cuttings occur during the work day, how will that work with her new job?
What we need in a Mayor is someone who will present a positive image about Pickerington, be present for ALL the ribbon cuttings, grand openings etc, and be a uniter of everything dealing with the public image of Pickerington. I admit there currently is a low threshold to surpass to show improvement of the performance of David Shaver, but hopefully someone else will run that better matches the needs of Pickerington.
It is time for change in Pickerington Politics. Riggs is not a change agent but represents a continuation of the current administration.
God help us all if there is no other choice.
nobody
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 8
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: Not what's needed
Heidi preaches a good game but needs people behind the scenes telling her what to say and do. She's a good-ol buddy Republican tied to the Lancaster crew and county party but she's has a Democrat running her campaign.
We need original thoughts and someone concerned about the city of Pickerington not another clone.
Thanks but no thanks Ms. Riggs.