Pickerington Times?–Sun
Councilmen's opinions about proposed JEDD differ
By DAVID S. OWEN
Published: Monday, December 3, 2007 10:05 PM EST
Thursday, Nov. 29, Pickerington Village Council's Finance Committee discussed and scheduled a work session and public hearing for a Joint Economic Development District agreement involving the city, Violet Township, Bloom Township, Canal Winchester and Lancaster.
The JEDD agreement concerns economic development opportunities along the U.S. Route 33 corridor and if all five entities ultimately approve it they become eligible to participate in sharing the revenues generated from it.
Although some council members are in favor of supporting the proposed JEDD agreement, there are some who are skeptical.
''It's a piece of crap,'' said Councilman Ted Hackworth.
''The problem with it is the government entity that would provide the vast majority of the infrastructure, the water, the sewer, the roads, is the county, and they just became aware of this thing a couple of days ago,'' Hackworth said.
''I think working behind the backs of our county commissioners, who will ultimately have to provide the water, sewer and roads, is a big mistake,'' he said.
''Somewhere they're going to have to put this in their budget because when you do these things you don't just snap your fingers and there you've got $8 million to build a road or $6 million to expand a sewer plant,'' he said.
''If we we're serious about economic development down there we would have brought the county on board very early in this process instead of after the agreement was agreed upon.
''This thing is just a wish list, and there is nothing in this document that is going to spur economic development,'' Hackworth said.
''We don't have any kind of a plan in place on how we're going to provide the infrastructure and I will tell you right now there's nobody that's going to come in here and build any kind of development without water and sewer and roads, and if they already got it, why should they need to join the JEDD?'' he said.
Councilman Jeff Fix, who is in favor of the JEDD agreement said there is a lot of value in it and almost no risk involved in it.
''It's really going to help us grow our tax base over the long term,'' Fix said.
''And when we sit there and look at the budget and say how are we going to get out of this, well, there is no magic bullet,'' he said.
''You have to grow your tax base over time and this is certainly an opportunity to participate in a tax base that we would never get to on our own,'' he said.
''So it's a great opportunity for us over the long term, and it's nothing that's going to solve our issues next year or the year after,'' Fix said.
''But as we start to develop that area and start to see revenues flow, 10 or 20 years from now, whoever is on council then is going to see the benefits of what we're doing now,'' he said.
A council work session on the proposed JEDD agreement is scheduled for 6 p.m. Dec. 18 and residents will have an opportunity to ask questions and voice concerns during a public hearing at 7 p.m. Jan. 15 in Pickerington City Hall, 100 Lockville Road.
By Joe Taxpayer
Councilmen's opinions about proposed JEDD differ
By DAVID S. OWEN
Published: Monday, December 3, 2007 10:05 PM EST
Thursday, Nov. 29, Pickerington Village Council's Finance Committee discussed and scheduled a work session and public hearing for a Joint Economic Development District agreement involving the city, Violet Township, Bloom Township, Canal Winchester and Lancaster.
The JEDD agreement concerns economic development opportunities along the U.S. Route 33 corridor and if all five entities ultimately approve it they become eligible to participate in sharing the revenues generated from it.
Although some council members are in favor of supporting the proposed JEDD agreement, there are some who are skeptical.
''It's a piece of crap,'' said Councilman Ted Hackworth.
''The problem with it is the government entity that would provide the vast majority of the infrastructure, the water, the sewer, the roads, is the county, and they just became aware of this thing a couple of days ago,'' Hackworth said.
''I think working behind the backs of our county commissioners, who will ultimately have to provide the water, sewer and roads, is a big mistake,'' he said.
''Somewhere they're going to have to put this in their budget because when you do these things you don't just snap your fingers and there you've got $8 million to build a road or $6 million to expand a sewer plant,'' he said.
''If we we're serious about economic development down there we would have brought the county on board very early in this process instead of after the agreement was agreed upon.
''This thing is just a wish list, and there is nothing in this document that is going to spur economic development,'' Hackworth said.
''We don't have any kind of a plan in place on how we're going to provide the infrastructure and I will tell you right now there's nobody that's going to come in here and build any kind of development without water and sewer and roads, and if they already got it, why should they need to join the JEDD?'' he said.
Councilman Jeff Fix, who is in favor of the JEDD agreement said there is a lot of value in it and almost no risk involved in it.
''It's really going to help us grow our tax base over the long term,'' Fix said.
''And when we sit there and look at the budget and say how are we going to get out of this, well, there is no magic bullet,'' he said.
''You have to grow your tax base over time and this is certainly an opportunity to participate in a tax base that we would never get to on our own,'' he said.
''So it's a great opportunity for us over the long term, and it's nothing that's going to solve our issues next year or the year after,'' Fix said.
''But as we start to develop that area and start to see revenues flow, 10 or 20 years from now, whoever is on council then is going to see the benefits of what we're doing now,'' he said.
A council work session on the proposed JEDD agreement is scheduled for 6 p.m. Dec. 18 and residents will have an opportunity to ask questions and voice concerns during a public hearing at 7 p.m. Jan. 15 in Pickerington City Hall, 100 Lockville Road.
By Joe Taxpayer