|
|
I hear that the city is going to hire a SECOND full time city engineer. Another bad idea. Somebody from the city will try to defend this as a money saving idea. When they do, I will respond, blowing their reasons why this will save money out of the water.
Keep your eyes on the discussion page. I'll be adding reason 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the coming weeks.
By Keep two hands on your wallet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Ted
We look forward to your insight and analysis.
As you toil away grinding your ax, try not to get an upset stomach eating those sour grapes.
One shortcoming I will point out in your campaign is that you have too high of an opinion as to your voice resonating with voters. ''Ted who?'' is a comment I hear often.
Ok, a second point - if everyone who reads this site votes with you, then we would have maybe 10 votes against.
Come on - it's time to move past Ted's politics and join forces to support this community. What he is failing to tell you is that if the tax issue fails, all too soon we will be in bad enough shape that even Super Ted with his red cape with the S on it can't save.
|
|
|
Actually...
This sounds more like someone who works for the City's engineering firm...
|
|
|
Wrong and wrong
Not Mr. Hackworth.
Don't work for the engineering firm.
Just hate to give my money to council to spend unwisely.
By Hang on
|
