Tim Byrant, Mark Uher is asking you questions that he said he knew in mid October. Mr. Uher by his own postings said that PATA members supported Wes Monhollen. Yet today he is asking you who these members are? The reason he will never know is because he crashed our one and only public meeting in February 2000. At that meeting, Mr. Uher took it upon his self to call for Mrs. Carlier?’s resignation from the school board. That was partisan and we don?’t stand for that. Mark Uher?’s only role in life is a troublemaker and roadblock.
The PATA mission statement one more time:
?“To consult, review and make public comments on issues that affect Pickerington area taxpayers. To encourage and provide a forum for Pickerington area taxpayers to speak out.?”
This discussion page is one of those forums. The home page also publishes public documents that are of interest to all. Mark Uher ignores the fact the City of Pickerington and the Pickerington school district have hired at taxpayers expense ?“Communication Directors.?” They conveniently leave out important facts that are public record for all of us to make our public comments on. In other words, our public dollars are being spent to spin the truth back to us all.
He asks you if PATA is a non-partisan organization. We clearly disclaim any endorsement of any candidate or issue right on our home page. We are neither Republican nor Democrat. Mark Uher is not an IRS agent so he is not entitled to any financial information. Basically all those questions he asks are none of his business. PATA did not recruit candidates for office. Even if they had, there is nothing wrong with asking someone to run for office.
What everyone must look at is what Mark Uher rolled off the front screen of the discussion pages. What is Mark Uher trying to hide? Is his explanation of the poor showing of the Pickerington High School graduates in 4-year colleges? Is it all the windfalls that seem to come Daryl Barry?’s way? Does he really have an answer for all the apartments that will soon be zoned into the school district? If Mark Uher really cared about this school district and this community he would be asking more important questions than what and where PATA gets it?’s money and who do they talk too.
By Old Flatulence
The PATA mission statement one more time:
?“To consult, review and make public comments on issues that affect Pickerington area taxpayers. To encourage and provide a forum for Pickerington area taxpayers to speak out.?”
This discussion page is one of those forums. The home page also publishes public documents that are of interest to all. Mark Uher ignores the fact the City of Pickerington and the Pickerington school district have hired at taxpayers expense ?“Communication Directors.?” They conveniently leave out important facts that are public record for all of us to make our public comments on. In other words, our public dollars are being spent to spin the truth back to us all.
He asks you if PATA is a non-partisan organization. We clearly disclaim any endorsement of any candidate or issue right on our home page. We are neither Republican nor Democrat. Mark Uher is not an IRS agent so he is not entitled to any financial information. Basically all those questions he asks are none of his business. PATA did not recruit candidates for office. Even if they had, there is nothing wrong with asking someone to run for office.
What everyone must look at is what Mark Uher rolled off the front screen of the discussion pages. What is Mark Uher trying to hide? Is his explanation of the poor showing of the Pickerington High School graduates in 4-year colleges? Is it all the windfalls that seem to come Daryl Barry?’s way? Does he really have an answer for all the apartments that will soon be zoned into the school district? If Mark Uher really cared about this school district and this community he would be asking more important questions than what and where PATA gets it?’s money and who do they talk too.
By Old Flatulence