Purpose of Recall
Dear Mr. Schuster
Thank you for your comments. Having just read the comments of Mike Kiger and the quotes from Brian Fox and Craig Maxey, it is evident that these political leaders do not understand the role of recall in a democratic society.
Under our charter, and the charter of many other cities, there are several avenues for democratic participation. The first that comes to mind is the election of representatives to fulfill governmental functions. Elections, however, do not creat immunity and merely staying clear of criminal conduct does not have any relevance to the issue of recall.
It is clear that it is possible that at time people may wish to change their elected officials for a wide variety of reasons. People may have made mistakes in the selection of representatives, repsresnetives may be selected because they misrepresented their views to the public or that they simply, once elected either fail to perform their duties or continue to pursue a policy that is anathema to the citizens of the community. In such cases, citizens do not have to wait the entire time of an elected official to remove the official from office, but may use the recall process to replace the representative.
The recall process does not require that there be proof of criminal misconduct nor is it any less democratic than any other election. To suggest that those who choose to excercise democratic rights are ''cowardly'' as Mr. Kiger does merely demonstrates his lack of understanding of democratic institutions.
Moreover, it is suprising to here from a person who never was appointed, rather than elected, to the office of city council that is is ''unfair'' to submit the question of whether he should remain in office to the voters. Mroever, it particulary sad to hear elected officals claim that they ahve a right to stay in office merely because they have steared clear of a felony conviction.
By David Shaver
Dear Mr. Schuster
Thank you for your comments. Having just read the comments of Mike Kiger and the quotes from Brian Fox and Craig Maxey, it is evident that these political leaders do not understand the role of recall in a democratic society.
Under our charter, and the charter of many other cities, there are several avenues for democratic participation. The first that comes to mind is the election of representatives to fulfill governmental functions. Elections, however, do not creat immunity and merely staying clear of criminal conduct does not have any relevance to the issue of recall.
It is clear that it is possible that at time people may wish to change their elected officials for a wide variety of reasons. People may have made mistakes in the selection of representatives, repsresnetives may be selected because they misrepresented their views to the public or that they simply, once elected either fail to perform their duties or continue to pursue a policy that is anathema to the citizens of the community. In such cases, citizens do not have to wait the entire time of an elected official to remove the official from office, but may use the recall process to replace the representative.
The recall process does not require that there be proof of criminal misconduct nor is it any less democratic than any other election. To suggest that those who choose to excercise democratic rights are ''cowardly'' as Mr. Kiger does merely demonstrates his lack of understanding of democratic institutions.
Moreover, it is suprising to here from a person who never was appointed, rather than elected, to the office of city council that is is ''unfair'' to submit the question of whether he should remain in office to the voters. Mroever, it particulary sad to hear elected officals claim that they ahve a right to stay in office merely because they have steared clear of a felony conviction.
By David Shaver