Also, by addressing BB, I assume you believe he and I are the same person???? If so, you are very very wrong.
------------------------------------
First off, according to the standard set forth by BigBrother, if you answer to any name someone calls you it must be fact. Therefore?
If you don't like the rules set forth by Bigbrother, I suggest you talk with the master debater himself. I think this could be funny when some calls someone a really bad word.
-------------------------
I don't make any rules, davieboy. Unlike, who wishes to control this board by any means. I simply make observations on things I know and see.
"Also, by addressing BB, I assume you believe he and I are the same person????"
I just have to say that HiR called Mallcontent on the post addressed to BB. Your words here would have had a little merit had you posted back to me, and qualified your post like HiR has, denouncing the davieboy name. And so....just like all those other times you were outted with different usernames, you made no like declaration as HiR did. Once again, that is called a tacit admission and you remain burned all over again. It only becomes funny to watch you post after such an admission.
You see, in law, which I am experienced in, and you aren't...an innocent person would raise objection or deny when unjustly/wrongly accused of something. A guilty person lets the issue ride without addressing it; making that a tacit admission. And guilty is where you are at once again and that post-proof stands forever.