I am trying to grasp the meaning and intent of the second poster.  I read all of these posts and appreciate all of the divergent views that are expressed, but every once in a while I see one that I can not comprehend.  So, my comments/questions are to get information; to to be critical of the poster.

First, I am trying to understand why the residents did not know about the speed humps since their sigatures are required before the city installs the speed humps.   ?????

Further, I have been at City Commission meetings in which comments were made that so and so resident did not want a street light on their property.  Judging by that, it would appear that residents have been "fore-warned."

Is the poster elderly or advocating for the elderly?  Is she/he taking a position against the speed humps and/or street lights?  Is there something here that I missed that would hurt the elderly by the installation of the humps/lights? 

Elderly do not have computers?  I have computers and I have been classified as elderly for 8 years. In fact, some might say I make maximum use of my computers judging by the number of posts I have made on this site   I also found it very useful in putting together the Neighborhood Watch.

Seriously, I would really like to understand;  I really am not being critical.

So, my comments/questions are to get information; to to be critical of the poster.  Wrong!!  I meant to say not to be critical of the poster

The speed bump on Bellemeade was installed in front of their property.  They did not sign the petition and told the petitioner that they did not approve of the speed bumps.

I meant to include that one property involved did not sign.  I know the opposite side of the street did.