Clarification
Jack is NOT the ACCGuy. Jack did NOT approve the 16 foot tall shed. In fact the ACCGuy probably didn't either. The approval was probably for 8 1/2 feet but the shed was built too big.
It was the ACCGuy that asked to meet another resident in person ''to discuss'' the issue. To some, that seemed like a threat.
What several residents did, including Jack and myself, was to question how some requests are approved when others are not.
Jack expressed his concerns, like we all should be able to. He was never asked to remove his posts. He was never asked to edit those posts.
The problem was that Jack and I both had first hand information on some of the issues within the ACC committee. We both served on it for a time with the ''ACCGuy''.
He did volunteer to update the other web site and discussion forum. In my opinion that site was good and he was doing a great job.
It is a shame that we lost that web site for what appears an attempt to hide the opinions of the residents of the neighborhood.
Jack is NOT the ACCGuy. Jack did NOT approve the 16 foot tall shed. In fact the ACCGuy probably didn't either. The approval was probably for 8 1/2 feet but the shed was built too big.
It was the ACCGuy that asked to meet another resident in person ''to discuss'' the issue. To some, that seemed like a threat.
What several residents did, including Jack and myself, was to question how some requests are approved when others are not.
Jack expressed his concerns, like we all should be able to. He was never asked to remove his posts. He was never asked to edit those posts.
The problem was that Jack and I both had first hand information on some of the issues within the ACC committee. We both served on it for a time with the ''ACCGuy''.
He did volunteer to update the other web site and discussion forum. In my opinion that site was good and he was doing a great job.
It is a shame that we lost that web site for what appears an attempt to hide the opinions of the residents of the neighborhood.