Afraid Of No One
Again, the Mayor has no say what bills do or do not get paid. That was a mistake that Debbie Cain made. She had more power and authority than she knew. She should have learned her job.
Council did not do their jobs. Why do you constantly single out one person when there are more people at fault? Why are you unwilling to place the blame where it belongs?
I do not condone anyone being paid twice for a job they should have completed the first time. But, I have seen no proof that anyone was paid twice.
As to Pomeroy or any other firm that the Village will do business with, it is the job of the Council to see that contracts are properly enacted and Council MUST approve all changes to a contract. Again, it appears that past councils did not do the oversight that they should have.
The letter that you reference from OPWC DOES NOT state that Pomeroy was paid twice for the same work. The letter is a reminder to the Village that money for a project CANNOT be used to fix problems from previous projects. It did not accuse anyone of wrong doing. Again it would appear that your interpretation of the letter is different then everyone else's. You want to read something into the letter that is not there.
I cannot change the past, what I can do is make sure that history does not repeat itself and insure that the Council does it's job and provides the proper oversight.
Again, the Mayor has no say what bills do or do not get paid. That was a mistake that Debbie Cain made. She had more power and authority than she knew. She should have learned her job.
Council did not do their jobs. Why do you constantly single out one person when there are more people at fault? Why are you unwilling to place the blame where it belongs?
I do not condone anyone being paid twice for a job they should have completed the first time. But, I have seen no proof that anyone was paid twice.
As to Pomeroy or any other firm that the Village will do business with, it is the job of the Council to see that contracts are properly enacted and Council MUST approve all changes to a contract. Again, it appears that past councils did not do the oversight that they should have.
The letter that you reference from OPWC DOES NOT state that Pomeroy was paid twice for the same work. The letter is a reminder to the Village that money for a project CANNOT be used to fix problems from previous projects. It did not accuse anyone of wrong doing. Again it would appear that your interpretation of the letter is different then everyone else's. You want to read something into the letter that is not there.
I cannot change the past, what I can do is make sure that history does not repeat itself and insure that the Council does it's job and provides the proper oversight.