You've Got It...
your's is one way to reason an override; mine is another. I understand that monies derived from an override will be used for specific purposes and not for raises. What I am saying is that by lumping expenses into an override, and not taking these expenses from the general budget, that we in fact are freeing up monies to be used for new personnel and additional raises. I think we spend too much in those areas already. Proponents of an override are always asking where the 'extra funds' are but, I'm not saying there are extra funds but misused funds. I feel 80% of our budget is too much to allot to salaries and benefits in a town our size. Everytime we prioritize expenses under a special tax we allow our base taxes to be used to gorge this problem. I think l5 student classrooms would be great, new roads ideal, a 90 member police dept. and a 90 member fire dept. peachy, a revamped town hall impressive, etc.,etc.; but, I would like to see that some effort has been made in revamping our departmental structures first, I would like to see the demise of yearly 6% pay raises in fiscally difficult times first, before I sign on to new taxes. We cannot seem to negotiate any means that saves us a dollar we only know how to ask for new dollars. I so not refute anything you posted except the mind set supporting the tax; I believe it to mirror a 'tax and spend' ideology. And I think it fair to say that cannot be refuted for all you need do is look to the school committee giving raises without sufficient funds to back them, or the BOS calling for new support personnel without monies to pay them. For our leaders to act in this manner is offensive to me, they have broken the public trust and do not deserve to be seated. When you reach your limit at home where do you go for more money? There has to be a limit doesn't there? 2 1/2 is our limit, make it work first, then approach me for a loan, which all a debt exclusion really is. So I thank you for taking the time to write an explanation to/for me, but at this time I will not propagate the current status, I will be voting NO.
By Nay to Override
your's is one way to reason an override; mine is another. I understand that monies derived from an override will be used for specific purposes and not for raises. What I am saying is that by lumping expenses into an override, and not taking these expenses from the general budget, that we in fact are freeing up monies to be used for new personnel and additional raises. I think we spend too much in those areas already. Proponents of an override are always asking where the 'extra funds' are but, I'm not saying there are extra funds but misused funds. I feel 80% of our budget is too much to allot to salaries and benefits in a town our size. Everytime we prioritize expenses under a special tax we allow our base taxes to be used to gorge this problem. I think l5 student classrooms would be great, new roads ideal, a 90 member police dept. and a 90 member fire dept. peachy, a revamped town hall impressive, etc.,etc.; but, I would like to see that some effort has been made in revamping our departmental structures first, I would like to see the demise of yearly 6% pay raises in fiscally difficult times first, before I sign on to new taxes. We cannot seem to negotiate any means that saves us a dollar we only know how to ask for new dollars. I so not refute anything you posted except the mind set supporting the tax; I believe it to mirror a 'tax and spend' ideology. And I think it fair to say that cannot be refuted for all you need do is look to the school committee giving raises without sufficient funds to back them, or the BOS calling for new support personnel without monies to pay them. For our leaders to act in this manner is offensive to me, they have broken the public trust and do not deserve to be seated. When you reach your limit at home where do you go for more money? There has to be a limit doesn't there? 2 1/2 is our limit, make it work first, then approach me for a loan, which all a debt exclusion really is. So I thank you for taking the time to write an explanation to/for me, but at this time I will not propagate the current status, I will be voting NO.
By Nay to Override