Muscatine

Typical



Typical liberal response...assume that somehow I accept what is reported. Where do you read any acceptance on my part. Dingbat.

I thought you liberals said it was alright to question everything!!!

Well? Got any facts to support the allegation of thousands? I thought not.

And...I certainly consider you more than the messenger; since we all know your motives here! Typical liberal.

Thanks for showing you have nothing on me more than assumptions, haysus.

What?

I'm sorry, I must have missed something. Your first post said:

Don't see a list of ''thousands'' here.
[...]
Did one fall through the cracks; or are there really thousands? Well then, where are ''their'' names?

and now you say:

Well? Got any facts to support the allegation of thousands?

But yet in both posts you've avoided commenting on the actual situation the article is reporting on. Instead, you've attacked the messenger at every opportunity. You've attacked the reporter:

One reporter with one article about one soldier's case just don't get it...but it sells stories, no?

The article:

Where are their names, if the news article can name one?

And me:

Dingbat

I don't know about anybody else, but I'd call that shooting the messenger. So, bigbrother, would you care to actually comment on the particular situation presented by the article? Or maybe you'd just prefer to continue throwing around insults and attacks hoping to redirect everyone's attention away from the real problem which is that this soldier (and many others, according to the article) is being forced to repay part of his signing bonus because the injury he sustained is preventing him from fulfilling his commitment.

I think I know the answer. (Like I said, typical conservative M.O.)

What?



What?

Haysus; you are much too quick to assume all.

You assumed I accepted this. Where did I say that? because I question it? I'm just following your lead.

You assume the news article is true. Is it?

You assume there are thousands because one reporter tells you that with no further proof. Are there?

Typical liberal, again. Assume the negative always exists without any substantiation.

And again, you are more than the messenger here...as always.

Note



One can sure note how haysus always plays the victim card. Ask him legitimate questions about his posts and all of a sudden he's being attacked and cries out how he is being victimized.

Liberals whine for legitimate debate; then when they get it; they cry foul.