Muscatine

Re-read definition, dingbat.

The definition doesn't say what he resigned from.   Please tell us.

Dingbats want to know.

You lose.....I win...simple....yes it does.....

Just a little review.

Fox says Lyndon Johnson was denied his part's nomination.

I say he wasn't denied, he withdrew.

The Fox asks "And the Democratic didn't have anything to do with his resignation?"

BS jumps in with no answer but with name calling "Being denied his party's nomination is not how it works, brainiac."   And goes on to say "He withdrew from the race..."

I ask Fox, "What resignation are you talking about?"

BS jumps back in with some kind of a definition of resigning. and acknowledges "even I said he voluntarily withdrew."   But then inexplicably, says "Definitely a resignation."

I say "Yes, he withdrew.  He didn't resign."

BS responds "Nope, he resigned."

I ask him to tell us what he resigned from.

BS goes into name calling mode again with "Re-read the definition, dingbat."

To which I say " The definition doesn't say what he resigned from."

BS responds with "You lose...I win...simple ...yes it does."

BS,

You've gone through most of your manipulations when you haven't a leg to stand on.

Change the argument from between denial and withdrawel to resignation.

Do a little name calling.

Give a definition for the word you wish to argue about.  

Then suggest your adversary can't read and comprehend.

Then give up with the classic declaration of, "You lose...I win."

It was not a very good performance on your part.