What truly tells volumes is that you spent so much time on this Clintonesque arguement over one word, when the meaning of the original statement is so clearly apparent.
Carry on Mal. You're the best friend a conservative has.
|
What truly tells volumes is that you spent so much time on this Clintonesque arguement over one word, when the meaning of the original statement is so clearly apparent.
Carry on Mal. You're the best friend a conservative has. |
|
|
|
||
|
Re-read the definition. |
|
|
What truly tells volumes is that you spent so much time on this Clintonesque arguement over one word, when the meaning of the original statement is so clearly apparent.
Carry on Mal. You're the best friend a conservative has.
I listened to Limbaugh for approximately 3 minutes yesterday. He was on Obama for the, I think it was, 243 deficient bridges that could be fixed with his jobs bill money. Limbaugh morphed that into 243 bridges in imminent state of collapse which would plunge people to their deaths. Never mind, it might have just been a handrail problem. I didn't listen long enough to find out if he thought they should fixed immediately or if it was a waste of money to fix them at all. He probably made both arguments and blamed Obama for not doing both. |
|
|
I believe his point was that Obama was making it sound like these bridges were in a horrible state, and questioned why he was holding all of us potential bridge collapse victims hostage to his "jobs" bill. You really must listen longer than three minutes to get the angles. Your assumption on his making both of those arguments was of course wrong, but we are used to you being wrong. It's part of your simplistic and predictable charm.
But I am encouraged that you keep trying. |