I'm with you on this one. BS reads too much into things to make them fit his world.
The reader is left with the interpretation of the literal words before them. Maybe you should take a remedial writing class, mallcontent.
I'm still waiting for you to prove which sediment in the Gulf is Iowa's. (he he he)
"Nedl, I see Roger Roth is running, and Kim Otto perhaps there is someone you can consider?"
BS, When this reader is "left with the interpretation of the literal words before them", (see above) they see no hint of "bashing".
Your implying that the reader is ignorant or uneducated doesn't change anything.
I will never prove which sediment in the Gulf is from Iowa. It's not provable. What can be determined is the amount of NOx or other chemical (not sediment) which is from Iowa. It's measured when it leaves the state not after is co-mingled with that from all other states.
Last word on the subject.
Hmmmph....I'm left to wonder how they measure this chemical. Is it down near Burlington, or Fort Madison? Do they have a little boat in the middle of the river with signs that say "Iowa Chemicals to the right, Wisconsin/Minnesota chemicals to the left"? Is there something special about those Iowa chemicals that make them different from the Wisconsin/Minnesota chemicals? If Ned pees in the river, does it throw off all of the gauges and measuring devices? Is "co-mingled" really a word, and if so does anybody give a rats backside about the whole subject? If they measure it after it leaves the state, how do they keep it from "co-mingling"? Is there chemical racism involved, and if there is, will Al Sharpton be putting in an appearence? If Sharpton shows up, will BDI be there with oatmeal cookies?
So many questions.
Gives a whole different meaning to the saying "Crazy like (a) the Fox".
This leads me to believe that you don't understand the term "crazy like a fox", which is of course understandable when one considers that it's you.
I had high hopes that you'd have an answer for at least one of the questions.
