So you are still evading the "Iowa-sediment-in-the-Gulf bullshit!" by changing the parameters?
I changed no parameters. It has always been about nitrogen compounds from the beginning. I don't think silt was mentioned until you brought it up. If it was, it was as a carrier of the nitrogen. You can check it out if you wish. I'm not going to.
It really makes little difference which pollutant we discuss, the method of measurement is nearly the same.
Change rules in the middle of the issue when you lose, huh, malldork?
What rule do you refer too?
Still waiting for all that proof from you.....pending....pending....pending.....
When you demonstrate you understand the rudiments of mensuration, chemistry, statistics, sampling, watersheds, catchment basins, and even the uses of addition, subtraction, and multiplication ask me again.
No, don't ask me until you make an attempt to prove I'm wrong using the above sciences. Not just more blather.
Fox, you could think about this too.
I think everybody is tiring of this.
