The bigger chance of voter fraud is the electronic ballot readers and counters. There the right person can program the whole thing to come out anyway they want. And there have been examples of where that all but certainly happened.
"...where that all but certainly happened." Oh, so someone THINKS that might have happened, is that what you mean by 'all but certainly happened'?
It was one of those things which were not pursued, so we can't be certain. Kinda like the vote count in Florida. Called off before completed. In Ohio the Secretary of state was also the chair of the Bush/Cheney election committee and thus had no interest in pursuing an investigation of a fraudulent election which his guys won.
Do some research on the vote in Cuyahoga County Ohio 2004.
And just exactly who is the 'right person'? Wouldn't it have to be several right persons as if most places are like Iowa, there are a bunch of people involved in the election
Most of that bunch knows nothing about how the machine was programed. In the Muscatine Court House, I would venture to say none of them do.
process, members of both parties, so no single person could manage what you purport.
OK, it could take two or three, even six, sometimes. But it's not like Mobay's conspiracies where hundreds must be in on it.
BTW - why don't you answer my question as to why requiring identification would only affect dems? Come on, you can tell me!
It won't affect only dems. Never said it would. It will affect both D's and R's but D's to a greater extent. You should be smart enough to come up with a half dozen reasons why.
