Muscatine

Just Curious, I've been out of town and just got back, what a series of comments on this one.  You are certainly letting your desires be known.  If you cannot convince someone that you are always right, then you will use the term liberal, liar, as often as you take a breath.

Not much for your personality, but I think we now understand your motivation.  Are you being paid to defend the local polluter, or are you merely attempting to get into their "in group" for personal financial gains?  

We are sorry that you are back in town - you know that town that you don't live in anymore.

My, and others, motivation is to attempt to make you understand that your lying, inflammatory statements will continue to be proven to be just that - lying and inflammatory.

Nothing has been proven.   One publication says he has a conflict of interest, another says he left the firm.   You haven't proven either is right or wrong.

If you have a way of knowing he is not receiving payments from the firm after retirement, tell us.

Cooked the books, maybe.   Baked the cookies, I doubt it.   But if he did, I think he also ate his allotted amount.   Maybe more.

Just where is this publication that says he has a conflict of interest? The only place I have read this is on this forum by 'republican'. When I went to the Des Moines Register.com I could find no such article, so where IS that proof? The website of Stanley, Lande and HUNTER - not coulter as you claimed - does not list Roger Lande as a member of the firm, so that is the proof that he is not a member of that law firm, thus no conflict of interest - thus it is proven.