Muscatine

The suit that was dismissed, from the Journal article I initially posted, makes reference to a direct quote by the leader of CLAM regarding "the court's decision". If there is more than one suit; this quote has to mean this case, since there have been no other decisions in suits.

The quote from the CLAM leader refers to the decision to allow CLAM to intervene in the Iowa Attorney General's suit against GPC.

Then, there is a quote by GPC that "with Smith's ruling..."...."no other individual lawsuits remain to be litigated".

The other suit, which was settled in favor of CLAM, is by the Attorney General, not an individual.

That would be a pretty egregious mistake by the Journal if all this is wrong.

No mistake made by the Journal.    All the mistakes are by you and your comrades.

Again, on this suit, all had there hat handed to them. 

Not yet, there will be an appeal.

Now I think it's time some of you apologized to Republican for all the abusive language used.   That especially applies to the BigBlowhard.

I like that.

Not sure the Attorney General can allow a single plaintiff to enter into a case against anyone or any company that they have started. Otherwise it would be a class action suit like the one the Attorney General started against Microsoft in which all parties who wished received a payout. Also if the Attorney General did start a suit and did not include everyone or persons possibly effected then he would be using taxpayer money for financial gain for a protected or special party which would be illegal.