Pickerington Area Taxpayers Alliance

Are you kidding me?

Posted in: PATA
Polling a long

I would say to Central Dad you need to lay off the coffee a little. I agree that Mrs. Reade does have a foot in mouth disease. However I believe the real problem, like many with the school system, is their thought process which is very narrow and some what tunnel like vision.

It is admirable that there is an effort to find out what the voters are thinking this time. I believe if a survey were conducted correctly, valuable and reliable information can be obtained even if it is a small percentage of the voters are polled. It must reach ALL of the demographics in the district.

However in the past the School Board has relied on their web site which has skewed the results in a number of ways. First I believe a high percentage of those voting or answering the School Web Site poll are also prone to vote for a levy. This in itself skews the results. If you look at the survey they have on the PLSD web site you see a lot of feel good questions. Most of the questions like ?“how we doing?“? Got very high marks 80 to 90% favorable. But when the questions was ask would you support or vote for a levy those 80% marks dropped to 55%. I believe those low marks were lost on many on the board.

To get an accurate poll you must include all of the demographics voting in your district. Phone polls are getting less accurate because of cell phone replacing land lines in many homes and phone numbers not being published or not available to the pollsters.

To get an accurate poll you must only ask 10 or fewer questions. I have received in the mail surveys and those surveys are sometimes 4 or 5 pages long with 25 or more questions. They simply get tossed.

You need to start the questions with soft ball questions like, ?“Is your child getting a quality education.?” Or is the School responsive to your child?’s educational needs. These questions will help you find those people that have vested interests in the school system.

Then there is the question of do you have children in the school system?

Also do you think your property taxes are too high?

Then the general question about the schools that everyone can answer or at least offer their opinion do you think the Pickerington Local School District is managing its money well?

Also do you think the Pickerington Schools are producing well educated graduates?

Then ask the big question can you afford a 2 Mill levy ($140 per year on a $200K home) to build needed schools.

Then would you vote for a 2 mill levy even though it would hurt your family?’s budget?

Would you vote for a 3 Mill levy ($210 per year on a 200K home) if knew that the expenditure was really needed.

If you had the choice would you prefer your school taxes come out of you earned income (income taxes) or from your property taxes?

Then the key is get someone totally unbiased to read and explain the poll to the board.

Last but not least keep one?’s foot out of one?’s mouth


  • Stock
  • nobody
  • Valued Neighbor
  • USA
  • 18 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Valued Neighbor
Surveys

Good follow-up to Central Dad's rants this AM. :-)

Let me preface this response by saying this is based upon a truely random survey. The school can't hand over the names and numbers of 400 parents of school kids because that is not random, nor is calling 400 residents at 5pm every day.

However, if a professional is used and 400 residents are surveyed with true survey questions the results can be highly accurate.

Assuming a population of 25000 using a sample size of 400 with a 95% confidence level you're +- 4.86. If you're shooting for a confidence level of 99% (95% is common for researchers) your confidence interval is +- 6.4

To quote ''The mathematics of probability proves the size of the population is irrelevant, unless the size of the sample exceeds a few percent of the total population you are examining. This means that a sample of 500 people is equally useful in examining the opinions of a state of 15,000,000 as it would a city of 100,000.''

For Reference
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/Samples/ConfidenceInterval.htm

Thanks Lisa!

I'll think about that as much as I think about anything else you have to say.
Sorry about the $5

I know that would have bought you a half-gallon of gas. Speaking of gas, how about you AND I run for school board? What fun! Imagine the signs up and down 256 - CENTRAL DAD for School Board paid for by ''AnybodystupidenoughttovoteforCentralDad, Central Mom, treasurer.

Haven't you received this year's pray to play fee schedule yet? With three kids in more than one sport guess what? Hey Lisa, you just ate up what I had extra to put towards a levy!

Why not set the bar for athletics as high as they claim the bar is for academics? $1,000 per kid per sport per month per breath per heartbeat.

Better yet, try one, just one year with no extracurriculars. They did that when I was a kid in a small rather rural district. Guess what? We survived.

It wasn?’t an anger pill I took this morning apparently, it was a cynicism pill. Sorry.


By Central Dad
Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow