|
|
Jeff you are wrong
WHere are you getting your information? Jeff and Mitch were not on the council together. Ethics was passed in 2004 and the design standards were passed in 2005. Mitch was on BOTH the P & Z and Council in 2005. You have your facts wrong Jeff.
Those standards were developed long before you ever ran for council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On P&Z
Jeff was serving on P&Z at the time.
By Anoymus
|
|
|
Discrepancies?
There are a couple of discrepancies in the article along with several grammatical errors. I called Mitch yesterday. He hadn't received his paper yet but confirmed my suspicions. This was a telephone interview with the reporter typing the responses as he went. The grammatical errors should have been caught by editors. The discrepancies should have been resolved before going to print. Another reporter not researching his work.
|
|
|
Here's why you vote for Mitch
1. Mitch is goal oriented and committed to getting the job at hand done. He was praised for his accomplishments at DSCC when Mitch was first selected to council.
2. When on council, he was always well prepared at every meeting. Ask those he served with, staff and elected.
3. His attendance at council and committee meetings are a matter of record. Comparisons are available.
4. Mitch is involved in the community and those he volunteers with will attest his commitment.
He's heads above he alternative. I will vote for Mitch.
By Solid as a rock
|
