|
More CBR spin point 8
Points in Opposition to Pickerington New Homes
Moratorium
???¡ Adjacent areas that feed the school system, such as Violet Township and Columbus, will not enact such growth controls, and thus will continue the areas growth.
|
|
|
|
|
More CBR spin point 9
Points in Opposition to Pickerington New Homes
Moratorium
???¡ The City of Pickerington?¡?¦s housing market is starting to mature and attract higher price points, as evidenced by the 2003 Parade of Homes. This is a very positive development for Pickerington homeowner equity and appreciation. The moratorium will cut off new move up housing choices just when the Pickerington market is ready for them.
|
|
More CBR spin point 10
Points in Opposition to Pickerington New Homes
Moratorium
???¡ Innovative solutions to school funding challenges, such as Mayor Postage?¡?¦s proposed New Community Development Authority, depend on resources from new growth. The moratorium eliminates these creative options.
|
|
More CBR spin point 11
Points in Opposition to Pickerington New Homes
Moratorium
???¡ While it is true that economic and housing growth brings challenges that need to be addressed, cutting off growth will only reduce the amount of resources available to solve problems. The Youngstown/Mahoning Valley area of Ohio is a good example of what happens when growth is shut down.
|