Muscatine

O poor me

Posted in: Muscatine
You say they should do a better job of filtering - that is exactly why they are building a 100+ million dollar dryer. I am sure that the date of completion is probably at least a couple of years away, but it appears that clam and/or the plaintiffs in the lawsuit think that their actions will make it happen sooner.

There's a lot going on down there that a dryer won't fix.

I got my invitation to join the suit today.


Won't fix??? So now mallcontent is an expert on corn processing. We'll put that one up on the blackboard with Iowa nitrogen in the Gulf, and how Stanley's manages their construction contracts....

You say they should do a better job of filtering - that is exactly why they are building a 100+ million dollar dryer. I am sure that the date of completion is probably at least a couple of years away, but it appears that clam and/or the plaintiffs in the lawsuit think that their actions will make it happen sooner.

There's a lot going on down there that a dryer won't fix.

I got my invitation to join the suit today.


Won't fix??? So now mallcontent is an expert on corn processing. We'll put that one up on the blackboard with Iowa nitrogen in the Gulf, and how Stanley's manages their construction contracts....


Please tell us what is "going on down there that a dryer won't fix."

We, along with the EPA were told that was what was needed for the emissions and now msmal says that won't fix the air quality? So let us know what else needs to be done before we all die a premature death - well, some us would die prematurely, others maybe not.

  • Avatar
  • BDI
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Illinois
  • 870 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

She can't do that.

Neither can you. Unless you are the one doing the fixing? But if I understand the issue and by now I have learned a lot about it. A dryer isn't the problem but the filtration systems within. If 100 million plus isn't a serious attempt to fix the ---problem? then what else are they to do? I have been looking at some reports on-line that suggest that the particulate matter actually polluting is at times, hundreds od percentages above the accepted level and under the last ten years of EPA standards, no changes yet, that they just paid the fines and kept on polluting. Since all reports are subjective I'm----

Just asking.

  • Avatar
  • BDEye
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 153 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Heavens to Betsy.  All those official looking reports in the nice blue folders are just subjective, but that nice Republican poster fellow told me they were true.  Kind of like the time ol' Fred Wabash ended up with apples at his house.  Now it seems Mrs. Donatelli was missing some apples off her tree, but Fred insisted he bought them at the store.  The official report couldn't draw any real conclusions, but she shot him anyway.  Mrs. Donatelli is now serving time at Leavenworth, poor dear.

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow