You say they should do a better job of filtering - that is exactly why they are building a 100+ million dollar dryer. I am sure that the date of completion is probably at least a couple of years away, but it appears that clam and/or the plaintiffs in the lawsuit think that their actions will make it happen sooner.
There's a lot going on down there that a dryer won't fix.
I got my invitation to join the suit today.
Won't fix??? So now mallcontent is an expert on corn processing. We'll put that one up on the blackboard with Iowa nitrogen in the Gulf, and how Stanley's manages their construction contracts....
I don't claim to be an expert but apparently know more than you and the rest of the boys. You should go to the CLAM meetings and learn something. The environmentalist from GPC attended one and was quite informative about what the various pollutants are and how much the dryer would reduce each of them.
I'm surprised you apparently still feel so proud about knowing nothing about how to measure nitrogen in the Gulf.
And that you still feel the same way about thinking that when Stanley gets work overseas, they don't do any of it in Muscatine.
It's handled the same way as domestic work. For instance when they get a job in St. Louis they don't ship a whole design team to St. Louis. Only a damn fool would do that and not be in business for long.
Never once spoke to Stanley's overseas work. You are a liar. Back to square one. You originally stated they bring jobs to Muscatine when they get contracts. Our discussion was about unemployment here when you offered that. So now you are asserting that all contracts they get are managed from their Muscatine office? Do they bring jobs to Muscatine or not? That is what you lied about. Care to change your story? Because you certainly have not proven that.
You can keep saying I know nothing about gulf pollution; but as stated, that is the field I work in. How 'bout you? Where is your expertise on the matter from? And...we are still waiting for you to prove your claims on the "Iowa" pollution in the Gulf. You alluded here (again) about measuring nitrogen in the Gulf. Let me proudly remind you that your original claim was that it WAS Iowa's nitrogen....not just nitrogen. Still waiting.
I still don't see any Iowa nitrogen floating around identified as Iowa's. Do those particles of nitrogen have Hawkeye hoodies on or something? You lyingly claimed Iowa nitrogen was identified in the Gulf. I take water samples all the time and still have never had a lab report tell me that the pollutant was Iowa's, or Greg's, or Mammies', or California's. I wish you would just point that science out to the certified labs I work with around the country; as they must be operating in the dark and well below your scientific expertise! Gosh...you could get rich and quit working at Walmart and Louis Rich.
Clam meetings. No one has to go to clam meetings to know what is said there. They get published eventually and your blood-brother repbublibub keeps us informed after those meetings anyway. At any rate...now we know you are attending them, so I am sure you will keep us informed.
