Sorry Bruce
Bruce,
In my previous posting, I addressed you as Ted. Sorry.
Bruce,
In my previous posting, I addressed you as Ted. Sorry.
|
Sorry Bruce
Bruce, In my previous posting, I addressed you as Ted. Sorry. |
|
|
||
|
MAYBE
MARK, WE HAVE HAD TALKS AND IHAVE ALWAYS BEEN FAIR WITH YOU, YOUR LAST POSTING ABOUT BEING RIGHT AND I TOLD YOU SO, MAKES ME WANT TO STEP BACK AND REGROUP,DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ABOUT ALWAYS BEING RIGHT. I HAVE HAD PEOPLE APPROACH ME ABOUT THE RECOUNT BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRIED OF PEOPLE THAT THEY FELT WOULD MAKE FUN OF THEM AND MAKE THEM FEEL LIKE THEY WERENT RIGHT BUT WERE WRONG,SHAME ON YOU MARK MAYBE A LOT OF THE POSTINGS ABOUT YOU WERE CORRECT---IF IT DOESNT CHANGE ANYTHING MARK CALL ME UP AND TELL ME THAT YOU WERE RIGHT AND I WAS WRONG IF THAT MAKES YOU FEEL BETTER, AND YOU CAN SAY ''I TOLD YOU SO'' BRUCE ROOKSTOOL |
|
|
Good Luck, Bruce!
Bruce, The comment about ''I told you so'' should not be offensive. It is simply that I think your time and money can be used better to help our community. I was shocked in 2000 that not one vote changed in the recount. If you recall, the day of the election it was approved by only 3 votes until all the provisional votes were counted. I did provide you with all the precint information and wished you luck. Again, best of luck if you undertake this issue. |
|
|
Recount in Violet O & P
Bruce, Again, I think it is a waste of your time and money to have any recounted. In 2000, it did not change one vote out of 15,873. With that said, for only $20, you may want to only recount two large precincts, Violet O & Violet P. Here are the results from those two areas: Violet O - 239 Yes to 103 No (69% Yes) Violet P - 467 Yes to 226 No (67% Yes) Total 2 - 706 Yes to 329 No It is your Andrew Jackson ... not mine. Go for it. Best of luck! |